Pitch Deck Financial Review

Investors forgive rough design; they do not forgive numbers that contradict themselves. This review reads your deck the way a fund's analyst does — market math, unit economics, ask-vs-plan coherence, cap-table implications — and returns the fixes before the meeting instead of the pass afterwards.

When this service is typically required

• A raise is starting and the deck's numbers pages need a hostile read
• The model says one thing, slide 12 says another
• The ask (amount, instrument, valuation hint) needs sanity against the plan
• Feedback from early pitches keeps circling the financials

Indicative scope

• Numbers audit: every figure on the deck traced to the model or flagged
• Unit-economics sanity: CAC/LTV/margins consistent with the story
• Market-size math checked for the classic top-down fantasies
• Ask coherence: use-of-funds vs runway vs milestones vs dilution
• Rewrite support for the financial slides, in your voice

Key points at a glance

Deliverables

The annotated deck, corrected financial slides, the consistency memo (deck ↔ model ↔ cap table), and a likely-questions brief with defensible answers.

Information and documents generally required

The current deck, the financial model, cap table, and the term-sheet parameters you hope for.

Engagement process

Client responsibilities, assumptions and reliance

The story and ambition are the founders'; the review makes the numbers worthy of them. Meeting outcomes belong to the room.

Scope exclusions

Design/copywriting of non-financial slides, investor introductions, and negotiation of terms.

Frequently asked questions

This page describes the service in general terms as on 6 August 2026 and is not professional advice or an assurance of any outcome. Registrations, filings, refunds and departmental outcomes depend on facts and the concerned authority. Figures and due dates change; verify current positions before acting.